Making your code base better will make your code coverage worse
Maintaining a minimum of 80% code coverage can influence code decisions, potentially leading to suboptimal choices that prioritize coverage over quality.
MAIN POINTS
- High code coverage targets can drive developers to focus on quantity over quality.
- Code decisions may be skewed to meet arbitrary coverage metrics.
- The pursuit of coverage can lead to unnecessary or redundant tests.
- Coverage metrics may not accurately reflect code quality or reliability.
TAKEAWAYS
- Balance between code coverage and code quality is crucial.
- Code coverage should not be the sole metric for assessing code health.
- Developers should prioritize meaningful tests over achieving high coverage.
- Understanding the limitations of code coverage can lead to better development practices.