Internet Archive’s e-book lending is not fair use, appeals court rules
Publishers succeeded in their legal efforts even without concrete evidence of market damage, highlighting their influence and strategic capabilities.
MAIN POINTS
- Publishers won a legal case without presenting definitive proof of market harm.
- The outcome underscores the power and influence publishers hold in legal matters.
- Strategic legal approaches can lead to success even without solid evidence.
TAKEAWAYS
- Legal success can be achieved by publishers through influence and strategy, not just evidence.
- The case sets a precedent for future legal strategies in similar situations.
- Market harm evidence may not always be necessary for legal victories.